Given the things we know the traitor revealed to the enemy and the timeline of events Kanjuro is the one that makes most sense, he was probably a traitor even before the time jump.
So let me go over a few points:
1 Jack learned 2 things from the traitor: how to get to Zou and the fact that Raizo was there. Back when this was revealed most people suspected that a mink was a traitor, but Kanjuro could have provided them with this information as well. The samurai had a way of getting to Zou (probably Inuarashi or Nekomamushi’s Vivre Card), and Kanjuro knew that Raizo ended up there. Add to this the fact that his ability would enable him to send messages (and the Vivre Card) using his painted creatures.
2 After he was “captured” by Doflamingo’s men. He spent the next few weeks just sitting in a cell. He wasn’t sent back to Kaido or anything? Kaido sent an army led by one of his top men to get Raizo but he just let Joker hold on to Kanjuro?
3 The first time the traitor revealed the alliance’s plans in Wano it could have been anyone, but the second time among the information revealed was the fact that Hiyori is alive and in Ringo, not many people are privileged to that information – Zoro, Kawamatsu, Kin’emon, Raizo, Kikunojo, Inuarashi, Momonosuke, Tenguyama, Kanjuro and some other Straw Hats (some other characters may have learned it off screen but that is not relevant). Through the process of elimination and considering the points 1 and 2, Kanjuro stands out as the most suspicious.
4 This is more of a meta reason, but Kanjuro is the most underdeveloped of the Scabbards even though he was the second to be introduced. The traitor plotline would work well to expand his character and add extra conflict to the Scabbards.
Ready for some really exciting, full of adventure chapter 1131st of One Piece? Watch out for the latest chapter of your favorite manga online only here. Fresh from release and free.
At onepiece1100.blogspot.com, our approach to crafting reviews aims to provide valuable insights into various products, services, destinations, games, movies, and more. Here's a guide on creating impactful reviews that aid users in their decision-making process:
Prioritize evaluating from a user's perspective.
Demonstrate expertise and knowledge in the subject matter you're reviewing.
Support your insights with evidence—visuals, audio, or relevant links from your own experiences—to bolster the authenticity of your review.
Include quantitative measurements across different performance categories.
Highlight what sets the item apart from its competitors.
Discuss comparable options and recommend based on specific uses or circumstances.
Conduct original research to present both the benefits and drawbacks.
Track the product's evolution from previous iterations, emphasizing improvements or solutions to issues.
Focus on crucial decision-making factors based on personal experience or expertise.
Explore the impact of design choices on users beyond the manufacturer's description.
Provide links to useful resources, either your own or from reputable sources, to aid readers in their decision-making.
Offer multiple purchase options by linking to various sellers.
When recommending the best overall or for a particular purpose, substantiate it with first-hand supporting evidence.
Ensure comprehensive content in ranked lists, even if detailed single reviews are available separately.
In the realm of reviews, affiliate links are often used, rewarding creators when a reader follows the provided link to make a purchase. If incorporating these links, consider Google's position on affiliate programs.
Reviews are an invaluable resource for decision-making. Focus on the quality and originality of your content, adhering to these best practices to deliver maximum value to your audience.
No comments:
Post a Comment